Against Psychiatric Toxicity: Survivor Voices as Antidotes

---

But in the shadows of this openness, a deeper, more insidious toxicity hides: the institutionalization and medicalization of human suffering. “Mental health,” as commonly framed, operates as a cultural euphemism for pathologized suffering. It renders complex human experiences into diagnostic labels. It
neutralizes resistance, obscures political violence, and individualizes the consequences of collective harm. And perhaps most dangerously, it justifies systemic abuse in the name of care.

This is not a theoretical critique. For many of us, these are lived experiences. I write as a psychiatric survivor. I write from the margins of medicine, where people like me are often not believed. I write as someone who, in a moment of deep vulnerability, did what society tells you to do: I reached out for help. I went to a hospital. I asked to be heard. What I received instead was incarceration, sedation, and mechanical restraint. I was stripped of my rights, denied communication, and subjected to forced treatment. My body—my suffering— was read as evidence of madness. My pleas were used as justification for further violence.

This is what psychiatric toxicity looks like.

The hegemonic medical model of psychiatry, as defined in Health Anthropology, conceptualizes distress as a deviation from biochemical normalcy. Something faulty in the brain that must be managed, corrected, or subdued. This model, rooted in a Western, heteropatriarchal, and white supremacist tradition, erases the social, political, and ecological conditions that make suffering not only
understandable—but rational.

What happens when a young person, overwhelmed by the housing crisis, climate collapse, structural racism, and familial abuse, begins to lose sleep, dissociate, or want to die? The system tells them: you have a disorder. Your pain is a pathology. You are the problem. Toxicity, here, is not the pain itself but the framework that isolates it from context. This reductionist narrative allows us to ignore the structural causes of distress while framing psychiatric institutions as benevolent agents of rescue.

But too often, those institutions are sites of containment, discipline, and trauma in their own right. Behind hospital doors, people are restrained, isolated, drugged without consent, and denied basic human rights.
Toxicity in this sense is not metaphorical—it is institutional, legal, chemical, epistemic.

So what might an antidote to this toxicity look like?

Abolition of the (P)system movements are often misunderstood. They are not a wholesale denial of suffering or of biology. They are political and ethical movements that critique the power structures of psychiatry: the way it pathologizes difference, polices deviance, and medicalizes social injustice. Pain
is not always an illness—and “treatment” must never come at the expense of autonomy, dignity, or freedom.

Survivor activism, led by people who have lived through the psychiatric system, offers some of the most powerful antidotes. These voices reveal what mainstream discourse conceals: that institutions meant to heal can also harm; that many people are not “recovered” but are survivors of medical trauma; that
true healing often happens outside the clinic. Community-led alternatives to psychiatry are growing worldwide. Peer support networks, crisis collectives, trauma-informed spaces, and radical care circles
create environments where pain is embraced and healed, not pathologized. These spaces foreground consent, self-determination, and mutual aid. They recognize the interconnection between personal suffering and systemic oppression.

They are antidotes not only to psychiatric toxicity—but to the broader toxic logics of control, hierarchy, and dehumanization that structure our world. The ecological metaphor matters here. Just as environmental toxicity reveals the extractive, colonial violence of industrial systems, psychiatric toxicity
reveals how our institutions handle unwanted emotion, deviance, and trauma. In both cases, what is labeled as “problematic” or “unhealthy” is often a symptom of a deeper, systemic disorder.

Antidotes to toxicity, then, cannot be merely technical—they must be relational, political, and radical. They must address not only the visible symptoms but the root structures that create harm. We need more than mental health awareness campaigns. We need structural accountability. We need survivor-led spaces. We need a culture that stops treating grief, anger, and despair as pathology, and begins to recognize them as signals, as symptoms of a sick society.

We need new ecologies of care—ones that resist medical domination and nurture the possibility of healing on our own terms.

Aina Naval i Cucurella is a survivor. Through lived experience she writes and takes political action against systemic oppression, focusing on the Psychiatric Systems. She loves nature, animals, climbing, folk music and dance, and minorized languages. She usually writes in Catalan, her native language.